Comments
  1. The New York Times CompanyJacqueline Mroz8/21/1910 min
    2 reads1 comment
    10
    The New York Times Company
    2 reads
    10
    You must read the article before you can comment on it.
    • Pegeen
      Top reader this weekReading streakScoutScribe
      4 years ago

      Shocking. Truly hard to comprehend the motives behind the deceptions. I would like to believe the doctors were only trying to increase the odds of their patient becoming pregnant (live sperm vs frozen) but my gut is saying narcissism. Bottom line, there was no consent given. DNA testing can certainly be a Pandora’s Box.