1. We are a community of readers. Join us!

    Readup is a social reading platform. No ads. No distractions. No liking or upvotes. We help you pay attention to what matters: reading.

    Scientific AmericanFouad Khan13 min
    7 reads3 comments
    9.5
    Scientific American
    7 reads
    9.5
    You must read the article before you can post or reply.
    • jeff
      Top reader this weekTop reader of all timeReading streakScout
      1 month ago

      First off: fun read. I like the CPU clock speed simulation thought experiment. But this statement really surprised me:

      There is nothing in philosophy or science, no postulates, theories or laws, that would predict the emergence of this experience we call consciousness. Natural laws do not call for its existence, and it certainly does not seem to offer us any evolutionary advantages.

      How are humans anything other than the picture of evolutionary success? Isn't the yardstick basically who's getting eaten by whom? We seem to be doing pretty well in that department and I don't know why that success couldn't be attributed to what seems to be the main difference between us and other animals: (advanced) consciousness.

    • Florian1 month ago

      I love this topic - I learn something new in every article

    • kellyalysia
      Scout
      1 month ago

      What. the. fck. did I just read?

      Brains 'splode. Can't comprehend. Send help.