- @SEnkey
- View Thread
What on earth was Watson trying to say? Government statements like this remind us that official spokespeople defy reality with every breath; treat the public like morons; make a laughingstock of themselves; and encourage the citizenry to seek the truth elsewhere. As usual, the New York Times gave a more accurate portrayal of what the government is up to than did the government.
Credibility is a big issue. The last few years have not helped the citizens trust in our institutions, from both sides of the aisle.
Good for her.
I agree with the author's overall point. That being said there is a lot of false equivalency here.
The US of 2005 is in no real way comparable to the Russia of today. We had free and fair elections. Katrina was a disaster...like many other natural disasters. While US troops did commit war crimes - they were prosecuted for it! War crime were and are not a policy or strategy of our military. We take them seriously and do a lot of training -based on the case studies from Iraq/Afghanistan/Vietnam/Korea - to avoid them. You don't hear about the looting of Baghdad like we are reading about the looting of Ukraine.
Rant over.
To keep players from competing to avoid an uncomfortable photo op...not a great look.
I have friends with PTSD who swear by micro dosing.
This is interesting for several reasons.
Wisdom.
And I need to work on this more than anyone.
"A majority of the public, meanwhile, has $0 in student debt. If you limit your analysis to people under 30, the median student loan balance is still $0. For African-Americans, it’s $0. Most people do not go to college and do not incur student loan debt, and those non-debtors have lower incomes on average than the people who do go to college and do have debt."
I'm so guilty of this. I vent, and vent, and vent. It feels good? But it really isn't helping.